Return to Our Team

John R. Ellerman

partner | Dallas 214-387-3179

Expertise

John R. Ellerman is a Partner based in the Dallas office of Pay Governance. John is an active consultant who advises the compensation committees of Fortune 500 companies. Several of these clients have been served by John for 15 years or more. John's clients are principally in the energy services sector; however, he also has clients and relevant experience in the retailing, high technology, general manufacturing, casual dining, and financial services industry.

Previous Experience

Prior to joining Pay Governance, John was the managing partner in the executive compensation practice for Towers Watson (formerly Towers Perrin). For the last 15 years, John was the practice leader for that firm's executive compensation and rewards practice for the U.S. Western region.

Additional Information

John is a noted speaker on executive compensation and has presented to The Conference Board, WorldatWork, the Directors College of Corporate Governance, and other prominent groups. He was a contributing author of Marking Mergers Work: The Strategic Importance of People. John is often quoted in the business press and has been cited in The Wall Street Journal and other major newspapers.

In addition, John has held an appointment to the Division of Sponsored Research at M.I.T. After completing his academic pursuits and before entering the consulting profession, John served two years in the Department of Defense as a systems analyst.

Education

John has both BBA and MBA degrees from Stetson University.


Other Posts by

Recent OSHA Ruling May Impact Ability to Use Safety as an Incentive Metric

Some companies in the oil and gas, energy, utility, and manufacturing industry sectors have included safety compliance and/or improvement as a performance metric in their incentive compensation plans. Safety as a performance criteria appears frequently in incentive compensation plans for both executives as well as broad-based employee groups. Now, regulators have raised a potential problem with the use of safety as a performance metric. Continue reading

IRS Releases Additional Section 409A Regulations Concerning Executive Compensation

Section 409A was added to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC or “Code”) as part of the American Jobs Creation Act legislated in 2004. Essentially, Section 409A sets forth certain requirements for the effective deferral of compensation under nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Much of the impetus for Section 409A was the ability of certain executives to accelerate the payment of their supplemental retirement arrangements and deferred compensation at Enron immediately prior to the company’s demise. Continue reading

Two New and Important Regulatory Developments Impacting the Financial Services Sector

Last month, U.S. regulatory agencies released two sets of new rules affecting executive compensation. One set of the new rules has been developed by the Department of Labor (DOL) and deals with defining who is a fiduciary pursuant to rendering investment advice with respect to an employee benefit plan (subject to ERISA) or an individual retirement account (IRA). The DOL’s fiduciary rule is considered to be a Final Rule and will become applicable on April 10, 2017. The second set of rules is a proposal by six U.S. financial regulatory agencies (Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, and Federal Housing Finance Agency) setting forth new policies and rules pertaining to incentive compensation plans of certain financial institutions. Continue reading

Disclosure of Prospective Executive Compensation in the Upcoming Proxy and CD&A

Proxy executive compensation and Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) disclosure is principally based upon a one-year look back at executive compensation forms, levels, policies, and practices. In addition, the proxy tables and schedules which disclose the historical pay forms and levels for the Named Executive Officers (NEOs) are fixed in format and do not allow for any flexibility in reporting NEO compensation beyond that which is prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Continue reading

FASB Eliminates “Extraordinary Items” Concept — Implications for Incentive Compensation Plans

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has elected to eliminate the concept of extraordinary items under Generally Accepted Accounting Rules (GAAP), effective with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Continue reading

SEC Adopts Final Rules Regarding CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff has had a busy summer. Following the release of proposed rules and regulations regarding the CEO Pay for Performance and Clawback provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), the SEC on August 5, 2015 proposed final rules and regulations regarding the CEO pay ratio disclosure. The CEO pay ratio disclosure fulfills a further mandate of the Dodd-Frank legislation. Continue reading

SEC Proposed New Rules Regarding Executive Compensation Clawback Policies

Following the recent release of new rules and regulations regarding the proposed pay for performance disclosure requirement imposed on public companies by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has just released rules to add Section 10D to the Securities Exchange Act regarding executive officer clawbacks of incentive compensation. Continue reading

Shareholders Defeat Mandatory Deferral Proposal

Many large U.S. based multinational banking and financial services corporations have implemented executive compensation clawback policies that require the cancellation and forfeiture of unvested deferred cash awards or performance share unit awards. These policies typically condition the cancellation of deferred compensation if it is determined that an executive engaged in misconduct, including failure to supervise or monitor individuals engaging in inappropriate behaviors that caused harm to the organization’s operations. Continue reading

SEC Releases Proposed Pay for Performance Disclosure Rules

In this edition of Viewpoint, Pay Governance will discuss the proposed rules and the next steps companies should consider regarding pay for performance disclosure rules. The SEC intends that the pay for performance comparison will supplement the CEO pay ratio in providing shareholders with information to better assess executive pay for purposes of the shareholder advisory Say on Pay vote. Continue reading

SEC Issues Proposed Rules Regarding Disclosure of Hedging Rules; ISS and Glass Lewis Release New Documents Regarding Executive Pay Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has just released its proposed rules regarding the requirement for companies to report as to whether employees and non-employee directors are allowed to hedge or offset the decrease in market value of equity securities. Proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has just released a new document explaining the firm’s latest policies with respect to executive compensation, including its say on pay advisory voting services. Another proxy advisory firm, Glass, Lewis & Co. LLC (Glass Lewis), has implemented changes to its pay for performance and equity plan models. Continue reading

Download a free copy of our new eBook!
Simply provide your e-mail address and a link will automatically be sent to you.
Request a paperback version of the book. Input your address in the message field.