Return to Our Team

Lane T. Ringlee

Managing Partner | San Francisco 510-250-3286

Expertise

Lane T. Ringlee is a Managing Partner at Pay Governance. He advises clients on the design and implementation of executive compensation programs, as well as incentive plans and rewards strategies. Lane has extensive experience in managing compensation assignments for major corporations. Some of these engagements include: developing and implementing total compensation strategies, advising boards and senior management on the design and structure of executive and board compensation programs, and selecting performance criteria and calibrating performance levels for incentive plans.

Additionally, Lane has expertise in assessing and developing governance processes and structures for executive compensation, advising organizations in preparation for initial public offerings, managing competitive valuations, and modeling and analyzing equity and incentive programs for executive and management positions. Lane works with boards and top management teams of globally prominent organizations across various industry segments.

Previous Experience

Prior to joining Pay Governance LLC, Lane Ringlee held regional management positions with the executive compensation practices of Towers Perrin and Towers Watson.

Additional Information

Lane has led assignments assisting companies and regulated entities in demonstrating competitiveness of reward programs for government agencies and has testified before public agencies. Lane is also a frequent author and speaker on executive compensation topics.

Education

Lane earned a B.S. in political economy from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.B.A. in finance from Cornell University.


Other Posts by

What You Are Likely to Hear in the Board Room

In the first 3 months of 2017, our firm’s partners and consulting staff attended more than 200 corporate Boards of Directors compensation committee meetings in our role as executive compensation advisors. From attending these meetings, we have learned a great deal about certain issues emerging as dominant themes in Board discussions about executive pay and corporate governance. Continue reading

An Emerging Best Practice: Disclosing Prospective Executive Compensation in the Proxy Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A)

In recent years, the SEC has developed extensive rules and regulations regarding the reporting of executive compensation in the company annual proxy. Such reporting includes the narrative discussion of CD&A executive compensation policies and practices as they pertain to the CEO and NEOs. Additionally, the SEC requires that companies provide numerous prescribed tables and schedules reporting the historical elements of executive pay for the most recently completed fiscal year as well as the past 2 fiscal years. Continue reading

Alternatives to Quantitative Metrics in Performance Share Plans: Use of Strategic Objectives

Companies have migrated a significant portion of equity compensation to performance-based long-term incentive (LTI) awards—typically performance shares or stock units (PSUs)—from stock options. Over 80% of companies in the S&P 500 now have such plans; these also now comprise the majority weighting among LTI vehicles. This trend has been driven in, large part, by the desire of Compensation Committees to place at least one-half equity compensation in the form of “performance-based” pay as defined by the proxy advisory firms. Continue reading

Is a “target range” right for your incentive plan?

As shareholders of U.S. public companies demand more accountability for performance, Boards are under increased pressure to continue to strengthen the P4P linkage of their incentive compensation plans. In a 2013 survey of Compensation Committee members co-sponsored by the NYSE, Conference Board, and Pay Governance, the top 3 “challenges” that Committees stated they were facing involved incentive pay and performance goal setting. Continue reading

We are pleased to announce: “Pay Governance has Released an Essential New Book on Executive Compensation”

Pay Governance releases an Essential New Book on Executive Compensation. Continue reading

Press Release-Pay Governance Research Finds Strong CEO Pay-For-Performance Alignment

Our article was recently picked up by World at Work. Visit this link to be redirected to log in to their site. Our article has also been picked up by Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation. … Continue reading

CEO Pay-For-Performance: Highly Aligned When Properly Measured Using Realizable Pay

By Ira Kay, Lane Ringlee, Bentham Stradley, Brian Lane, and Blaine Martin   Partners Aubrey Bout Chris Carstens John R. Ellerman John D. England R. David Fitt Patrick Haggerty Jeffrey W. Joyce Ira T. Kay Donald S. Kokoskie Diane Lerner … Continue reading

Continue Paying Executives for Performance: A Rebuttal to the HBR Article “Stop Paying Executives for Performance”

The Harvard Business Review [HBR] recently published an article, “Stop Paying Executives for Performance,” by Professor Dan Cable and Associate Professor Freek Vermeulen of the London Business School. The authors present arguments and analysis that incentives do not motivate executives to improve corporate performance. In fact, they argue that incentives might damage performance. Continue reading

Two New and Important Regulatory Developments Impacting the Financial Services Sector

Last month, U.S. regulatory agencies released two sets of new rules affecting executive compensation. One set of the new rules has been developed by the Department of Labor (DOL) and deals with defining who is a fiduciary pursuant to rendering investment advice with respect to an employee benefit plan (subject to ERISA) or an individual retirement account (IRA). The DOL’s fiduciary rule is considered to be a Final Rule and will become applicable on April 10, 2017. The second set of rules is a proposal by six U.S. financial regulatory agencies (Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, and Federal Housing Finance Agency) setting forth new policies and rules pertaining to incentive compensation plans of certain financial institutions. Continue reading

Disclosure of Prospective Executive Compensation in the Upcoming Proxy and CD&A

Proxy executive compensation and Compensation Discussion & Analysis (CD&A) disclosure is principally based upon a one-year look back at executive compensation forms, levels, policies, and practices. In addition, the proxy tables and schedules which disclose the historical pay forms and levels for the Named Executive Officers (NEOs) are fixed in format and do not allow for any flexibility in reporting NEO compensation beyond that which is prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Continue reading

Download a free copy of our new eBook!
Simply provide your e-mail address and a link will automatically be sent to you.
Request a paperback version of the book. Input your address in the message field.